Who really had the agency there: the dating app, or the dater?
It’s a question that applies equally well to offline dating, too: When a relationship fails, what or who is ultimately responsible? The length of time they took getting to know each other?
Surely online dating has fed this trend in part, providing the constant buffet of alternative options that sociologists say plays a large part in determining whether a relationship fails; but at the same time, apps like Tinder could never have caught on if people weren’t already approaching sex and dating more casually.
It’s a bit of a chicken-or-egg problem: maybe online dating has made us more cavalier, or maybe our growing casualness fed online dating, or maybe these things both exist together in a miasma of hook-ups and right-swipes and shifting social standards.
And a 2013 paper that suggested Internet access is boosting marriage rates.
Plus a whole host of dubious statistics, surveys and case studies from dating giants like e Harmony and Match.com, who claim — , even!!
Or something squishier, something less precise — a factor not captured in charts and telephone surveys?
After all, 2.1 million people get married in the U. every year, and half of those couples will divorce.In fact, this latest proclamation on the state of modern love joins a 2010 study that found more couples meet online than at schools, bars or parties.And a 2012 study that found dating site algorithms aren’t effective.A record number of Americans have never been married, and only a scant majority — 53 percent — want to be.Americans get married later every year, if they choose to get married at all.Members use criteria other members set, such as age range, gender and location.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating